Hone Public Speaking

Misleading the test writing Web pages: the case of insatiable greed for profits at the expense of consumers and businesses established

In general, the problems of unfair competition, economic losses of a company may suffer the consequences unfair trade practices of others. This may involve in acts that mislead the public about the origin of products or "unfair trade" which includes, among others, misleading advertising, trade libel and misrepresentation of products and services.

False advertising is clearly defined by the Lanham Act as "any advertising or promotion that distorts the nature, characteristics, quality or geographical origin of products, services or commercial activities. "There are three acts which constitute" false advertising "namely:" a) disclose, b) defects and insignificant research and c) product disparagement. "No publicity when a false representation which is not true because it is the result of the failure to disclose a material fact. Therefore, the lies are false statements or accounts are valued incorrect and these statements are only somewhat correct.

The flawed and insignificant research related to applications that are not corroborated by an authorized investigation or contradict what wins by an authority or research "(§ 43 (a) of the Lanham Act), while denigrating the product refers to a creative act of unbelief in the product of a competitor.

For a case of false advertising to succeed, the plaintiff must prove that the statement in question is almost, if not practically false or misleading, the statement is likely to cause deception or confusion customers. In addition, the applicant must prove that the false statement or any statement made by the defendant is essential and important. Be considered important if affects the consumer decision to purchase the product or to use services.

"Passing off" May also constitute unfair competition. Lanham law prohibits "false or misleading description of the facts, or false or misleading representation of facts" in the trade that is likely to cause confusion or mistake cause, or deception as to affiliation, connection or association of such person with another person, or as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of their products, services or commercial activities by another person. . .

With the advent of advanced technologies and develop new ways and means of marketing products and services, there are increased risks to the unscrupulous marketing and use strategies devices. The Internet, for example, has been fertile ground for many paper mills and testing time personalized websites which adapt students who need relief from the stress of the survey requirements of writing and academic tasks.

These sites claim to be companies where not registered or incorporated in whole or in an incorporated entity or records and all other entities it owns are "affiliates" without the necessary documents or records as well. They claim that it is on the territory of United States and / or the United Kingdom as indicated on their website where, after checking his office at the specified location are lacking. These sites also claim that their documents are written by native English speakers, with PhD and Ma, during a Google search reveals that most if not all complainants writers are not native speakers of English, namely India, Pakistan and the Philippines. U.S. dominance will Registrars and used Latin name hosting companies. There are a few cases, as demonstrated by evidence that changes to their websites is a foreign Internet Protocol (IP) in Ukraine. These websites, as of press releases to be issued to influence the public mind that are actually the address in the United States says the announcement of seminars, symposia, and delivery of events that have been made several hotels, where, after verification and investigation, while none of the events occurred.

For example, dot com SuperiorPapers announced in September it would launch its first symposium on the role of 7-8 November 2008 at the Sheraton Reston Hotel. An investigation was made after this date and the Director of Revenue Management Sheraton Reston Hotel Complex denied any conference or SuperiorPapers (with documentary evidence consists of correspondence).

Another newspaper article was published September 27, 2008, she announced that BestDissertation dot com will hold its 5th Annual Conference of writing 26-28 September 2008 at the Sheraton Crystal City. The hotel staff, research has also denied the organization of the event in your hotel (with documentary evidence consists of correspondence).

The worst so far from the press information released is dragging San Diego City College, to support the use of term paper mills, particularly BestEssays dot com. PR article dated December 23, 2008, saying San Diego City College, which was associated with a point BestEssays COM seminar days have been found in the promotion of the essay website. She also said "the end of the seminar, San Diego College has recognized the valuable contribution to help promote the site www.bestessays.com participants. "The President of San Diego City College (SDCC) to be informed of this vehemently denied that the institution provides support the use of plants to long-term paper. It also states that no event as presented in the article were City College (with documentary evidence consists of correspondence). In fact, the SDCC website contains a section of press releases and events, but there was no such event ever occurs in the order as described in the newspaper article written by Lula Williams BestEssays.

Sometimes, early of December 2008, I realized that the site and SuperiorPapers dot com, More specifically, in the background is just logos under "As Seen the 'of TimesOnline, PittsburgLive dot com, New York Times, Computer Information Sciences (www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk) PlagiarismAdvice dot org GEOS7 and as shown in Figure 1 (Note that "bleached" the real logos of these companies even if some of these companies had given its consent for me after the image. I felt to display their logos, even when he is allowed to enjoy its stature and prestige). A website displays a thumbnail from 2008-10-09, but with an overlay of "TN PRO '(software land designated as Pro) in the lower right corner to cover the logos. The second Part of the logos, the "Times" and below "Pittsburgh" even are obvious. (The original plans webscr taken on 03 December 2008 and 09 January 2008 is kept for testing purposes). Officials from these companies after being informed of the use of their logos, and after seeing themselves SuperiorPapers the site has denied having anything to do with the plant site or any other long term paper for this issue. SuperiorPapers asked to "kill" their respective logos, display and use in your site has not been approved and authorized.

The Director of Services Dot Org PlagiarismAdvice and Northumbria Learning representative of the United Kingdom, Mr. Will Murray had originally asked the "withdrawal" from its logo to a time earlier this month and in the current January 9, 2009, we realized that we only got SuperiorPapers PlagiarismAdvice.org logo. Another logo used by newspapers higher without permission and authority was the Information and Informatics. According to Dr. Giuseppe Trombino MIET Information and Computer Subject Center for Higher Education Academy, "The company is using our logo without our permission and do not support the practice in any way. "On January 14, 2009, I realized SuperiorPapers who took the remaining 5 other logos.

Mr. Peter Butterworth, an e-business consultant National Center 2B2 target = "_blank"> explained that the logos and trademarks are protected by law. The combination of these logos without authorization to Company looks to make a profit stature and credibility of the brand-registered company has no knowledge or control. We may venture a reasonable assumption on the grounds of unauthorized use of logos of reputable companies and institutions established and / or those who claim to have open hotels and events in an institution where none existed, they have all done this in May on behalf of consumers / Public who have a physical presence in the United States of America and the inclusion of the logos of companies on their website is to establish legitimacy, stability and the adoption by these companies based on the services offered by SuperiorPapers. "The Web site of the battle song" production is complete, and "professional" research papers. I have some reservations about applying the word "professional" or "Professionalism" after what he had witnessed.

These sites are condemned and degraded sites suspected of false and fraudulent, not only for the reasons above, but also complaints from customers of a plagiarism of written work and their inferior and even the complaints of many writers who have not paid the tax has already won. Although most of these sites vote revisions Unlimited as requested by the customer or the return of what has been paid a fair solution has still not reached.

Writers are accepted as mere servants of the websites and not employees of it. Their fees are paid either weekly or bi – monthly arrangements. Orders or projects completed within fifteen days of the month must be paid within three days of success and the work of the sixteenth day to the end of the month is paid within three days of fifteen in the (same) months. Sounds like an orderly arrangement, but is not. A problem or a complaint regarding an order or complete a project on the site or the client (which is almost impossible to verify if it is real) will hold its earnings for the entire payment period to be pushed at the next pay period. When the subject is trivial and resolved without fault on their part (which is again almost unlikely because the test site, still find a reason to impose penalties), charges for the pay period as a whole delayed and rescheduled for the next period will not be reimbursed its repayment period of weak reasoning, who runs the line "We can not do anything about it because our web page. A euphemism for cheap "still want to hold your money and not pay." I remember one writer who weeps his heart in a forum and told how staff of one of these sites were tested. His evidence consisted of an email from the site saying: "We'll pay you! We'll have a party your money! "The manner of payment of royalties is made by PayPal, bank transfer or xoom.com and so on. Writers are not safe to be sentenced fined most of their fees, because the sites continue to gain by imposing "transfer fees or taxes" each time you send the fees writers twice a month. These transfer rates are exorbitant for the simple reason that they take more money from the fees charged by the writers. Contrary to what is said on their Web sites where the writers have promised to pay as high as $ 16 per page, this is just another trick, because writers earn only $ 1 to $ 3 in low season and $ 5 – $ 7 in a season and if higher levels of specialized fields of science, computer technology and social science.

These sites are on a spree of hiring non-English speakers, because these writers are only too willing taking orders due to a relatively high rate of U.S. dollar exchange in writing their respective countries. Another source of "benefit" of these sites is the offense of writers known as plagiarism. This means that the fragments of the reference texts are copied without adequate recognition of its source. Plagiarism software detects and identifies all material copied from the written work of a writer. Figure 2 is a screen of our website showing a draft report actual plagiarism by an author of one of the websites. The text is "bleached out" to avoid identification, but the highlight color when the text appears as alleged cheating and plagiarism. Once considered near the bibliographical with a title – "References" are highlighted in color and are identified as plagiarism. Any college student or otherwise, a student secondary value knows that his fate bibliographic entries and citations of references follow the strict rules of form. Obviously, if we follow "software" of this site, all bibliographic entries are more likely to demonstrate that the copy. The writer who escapes to the fines imposed, because it is like finding a needle in a haystack. To avoid the imposition of the fine, the writer must go through a qualitative analysis All written work, ie, line by line, to justify each relevant group of texts. Although the site has a department of insurance quality, function alleged to be limited to run papers through plagiarism software and then send it to the account of the author, so that a penalty is imposed automatically. This feature is not regularly observed, does that have long written more than seven (7) pages are verified by the software during the high season or when the person stops working for them. The writer who firm receive only what remains of their earnings after three (3) months.

There are written policies on fines as listed in the account of the writer on the site, which is not followed by staff and management of these sites are those that are not observed. The fines are usually 2 / 3 of total compensation to the author of this particular work. Support staff who do not know how to justify the death penalty when questioned by the writer. Not being able to understand and speak English fluently (prior to his support staff are from Ukraine), the imposition fines are often capricious as needed or should I say, the ambitions of its leaders.

It is obvious that these sites have different ways of benefit mulcting 'using unorthodox strategies. They make money from customers because of works written by their authors, they make money from his writers for his alleged extortion in the form of fines and penalties or the failure to pay taxes and their business plans in most of the expenses of filling writers transfer if transferred to banks.

In a case recently decided, Axact (Pvt) Ltd. c. Student Network Resources, Inc., Student Network Resources LLC, Ross Cohen and John Derito, 2008 WL 4754907 (DNJ October 22, 2008), target = "_blank"> the Court other than the imposition of financial penalties for violations of the Lanham Act, ordered the applicant that the Internet search engines, hosting and registrars of domain (i) of false advertising and misrepresenting the nature, functionality, quality or provenance Location of the applicant's goods and services in violation of the Lanham Act or common law. . . It should be recalled in May the author owned and operated 544 essay sites in Pakistan, but most if not all of them specifies a U.S. address. Although the plaintiff argued that also has offices in the United States, but also admitted that its plant is based in Pakistan. Default judgments are presented against the author who chose to plead in their own country. A Blog of Pakistan was also able to secure arrest site of one of the defendants' websites – Essayfraud. org – an organization recognized for trial monitoring against fraud took place and operated by the defendant, who said she was used as a means by which defamed the plaintiff. Both parties have won in their respective countries AXACT 6 million dollars and 694,750 dollars for SNR, but they say the absence of a treaty between the two countries have banned the execution of the respective judgments.

For some people, was essayfraud.org organized to fight against competitors or foreign websites. According to a blog, "Test fraud is not to sell services to American students Competitors or foreigners, but it seems to represent the interests of companies that do. "Personally, I have some reservations about the site had disappeared maintained their independence after an admission that has been operated and administered by a "competitor" term paper. With a clear conflict of interest for his presence and the absence of disclosure and transparency from the outset, an appearance of impropriety has been established which have undermined May all disinterested and confidence of the target person on the site.

There are forums that are still faced with the exposure of fraud However, the integrity of them depend on a number of factors, namely the purpose for which it was created, policies or conditions of use, member / posters, application Web Policy and other related reasons.

Since its initial launch February 10, 2006, EssayScam.org just tried to describe practices Term Paper fraudulent websites and business practices unethical companies. There were claims later that this site and allegedly essayfraud work together for the benefit of "protected sites". Other Claims have been conveniently missing items if they were harmful and detrimental to the interests "protected sites". I personally witnessed a few changes and disappearance of me a year ago when he ran with it. On June 26, 2007, a summons has been DMCA Essayscam issued in a case filed in the District Court of Northern Illinois docketed as Case No. 1:2007 cv03597. Little later the site has decided to reorganize your forum. There have been changes and one of which was a sign of its members have identified as a staunch defender employee of one of these protected areas "has been renamed as" guest "when everyone else has a different format that shows" reg., posts and profile "which means the reference date, the number of posts and profile (in the text of the hyperlink). I was surprised to see more posts by this member when in fact there were hundreds before. I remind the member who used to enter the "war verbal "with some other members and easily view the IP addresses of members were against him and a great discussion with the Forum. Anyway, In its recent press release dated December 12, 2008, which states that the forum is beneficial for students and freelance writers. The objective is to identify the sites or companies should be avoided and legitimate sites that can help. However, in its political and legal notice confidentiality, which states clearly that "it does not guarantee the accuracy or truthfulness of accusations members. The Readers and posters are invited to use the trial, even after conducting its own investigation. "In addition, in its press release, which guarantees Essayscam.org users will not be subjected to verbal threats. Sad to say, just read some of the posters placed in 2007, other labels, 'Clown' I'll kill you by inches, "" imbecile "," FU "." Some were requested. There are few professionals taunters "and provocative site that you follow each wire, stress and harassment until their last drop of patience. Comparing the old with the new posts have been the latest. Perhaps, now under new management or a moderator. Few go even as far as posing as law professionals, but it would be sad to say, show an apparent lack of literacy legal, and that leads us to think they are just impostors. If these members are threatening to be as legal or professional real behavior manifested in the form of posts written statement of the apparent lack of nobility and the lack of classical decorum befitting those in the legal profession. This question has been raised and brought before the competent judicial authorities for disciplinary research. If these people are true professionals in the right or the laying, the likely result of the shame of the profession should be avoided. I felt alleviate some of the posters in May and members are representatives of some companies and scripts. A group representing some legitimately created Web pages or companies, other group sites from other countries who are supposed to be fraudulently labeled, and of course, minorities. There is a turf war about. Some members of each group is unfortunately expose folds and other unscrupulous practices in the hope of putting their hands in their respective markets the name of profit. Oh yes, of course, for the benefit of consumers. There are very few who are motivated by a deep desire to help victims and fraud report and business practices unethical, but in time, leaving only the cause of disappointment. Taunters The Professional "instigate, inflame and AA induce anyone to lose patience. No one can say with certainty that the members are sincere and true or have the truest and purest intention to denounce the alleged fraud because the site itself represents and advises readers to even do their own research that the site does not guarantee the accuracy of the information displayed for members, but believes that the information published to respond to the best ability of these posters. It also contains a warning that the information displayed the same has not been verified by independent sources. If there really consumer advocates in the forum, aimed at protecting consumers is just for informational purposes only. And just as one must go beyond the real motivations of person behind the podium to treat and can first be seen in how the advertiser has published the information. Personally, I find information "biased" in one direction and proposed measures to be taken against the alleged scam websites are purely commercial test or whatever, but Surely financial security or financial harm to the business of a competitor. A shift in direction is not bad, but Overall, the lack of balance at times may be suspect. What I find amusing is that it makes one feel that all the grass to expose the alleged fraud trial sites overseas is the exclusive domain of a stoppage of a few "members rule and the lord. What I find even more pleasure is the fact that once a writer is identified as writing a web sites fraudulent and supposedly not a native speaker of English or ESL, which is immediately interrupted if you decide to go ahead and take risks with the site. He was ridiculed and stigmatized as someone who is as "criminals", as the owners of the alleged fraudulent essay written by the website of the self-proclaimed consumer advocates. I was forced to think that these are members who joined the interest wrote to the trial rival websites. For how can say it is there to expose allegations of fraud and assist consumers and simultaneously and with equal force to insult and humiliate vicitmized another important segment of the industry. Absit envy!

The point I emphasize is that the existence of the alleged scam and fraud of those who are called illegitimate test sites did not remove the fact that deceptive marketing practices and unethical are committed by a handful of companies legally constituted and established websites Web or writing essays, because both can exist and coexist. Sometimes I think that is even a parasite may be involuntary "dependence between the two "advertising" on the other.

It's like a medical student and doctor. The medical student listing it is a medical expert and falsifying certificates of training abroad, while the doctor creates a group of social work for victims medical student to discuss their pain and anger. The doctor thinks that victims are not sufficient to create an impact by keeping mind that it is losing their patients about the medical student who only pay a nominal fee. Supporters of the doctor – the nurse, his secretary and their friends to join the group of social work to gather information and encourage others not to encourage the student services medicine. And maybe use the information gathered for their own benefit. The doctor and a medical student practicing surgery in two different patients. The doctor left the gauze in the patient's stomach. The blades of medical students in the belly of the patient. Does the responsibility the medical student to diminish the responsibility of the physician? Not so. But are they equal? No, they are not. Similarly, companies legitimate U.S. and other legally organized and established writing essays all foreign websites doing business on the same Equality Plan. A level playing field where, ideally, a fair competition with other principles based on laws on fair competition – Where regulatory agencies and oversight exist to provide a place as a means to restore and repair the violated rights of their employees, consumers, and inventors.

We can not say the same thing for alleged illegal sites, especially when it comes to location Identity and physical layers of lies and deception. Returning to the analogy, one might wonder why the doctor did not report that the student medicine was illegally practicing medicine or if you are really victims of medical students, why does not the doctor or help guide to compensation. The answer is simple, I will not leave you. It is clear that both are equal in terms of insatiable desire profits.

The application of pronouncements on legal problems if or when it is demonstrated that the products and services of these sites are not really written by PhD and MA native English speakers as has been claimed and the publicity that is, if or when it is shown that the origin these goods and services is not the United States as stated, indicated on websites, in my opinion, misrepresentation of facts constituting a clear violation of false advertising provisions of the Lanham Act. The press releases of these web sites that contain may therefore be regarded as a Another way to shaping the minds of the consuming public of this false representation. Unauthorizec alleged use of logos may be able to form a infringement of copyright and trademarks of their registered owners. In addition, with the same force, but they must also investigate and punish those who legitimately established companies and institutions that are guilty of defamation and deceptive acts of commerce.

Unless governments respective states and the federal government to intervene appropriately and recording the sad state of the industry of writing tests, which can continue to wreak havoc and injustice to the public. Personally I know most of them were brought to the attention of authorities. Which we hope to express their grievances? Students who have opted services such websites written composition (regardless of whether they are made or created) using these tests or work session and go to their account in their schools and universities? Absolutely not, because removal is a severe punishment .. Authors whose revenue amounts that have been illegally detained were not even enough to hire a lawyer? Of course not. Consumer advocates nickname? Of course not, because they have their own membership interests to protect. The government should step in.

The FTC is the agency charged with protecting consumers against "methods of unfair competition acts "and" unfair or deceptive practices or "on the market [15 USC 45 (1)]." The Commission exercises this function through its powers enforcement for investigation and prosecution. The Commission is also investigating potential unfair practices that may prejudice or mislead consumers because of false statements. The foundation and the proof is often required by the Commission and there should be a finding of violation, is immediately forwarded to the Department of Justice for the imposition of severe civil penalties.

One of my friends asked me what kind Government spends billions of dollars of taxpayers' money on education that specific support an industry that promotes and encourages students to cheat by paying someone to write your academic writing? Are we not in contradiction with the very purpose functions of government? I personally believe that the primary consideration first, that any government must take is to protect the public against harm and injury from injury or economic damage. There is only so much misinformation generated by a type of unhealthy competition and food in public, especially young companies and established businesses. It is time for government to intervene and take decisive action for alleged violations federal and state laws. Subsequently, all the world can hope that the legislators to pass laws either to discourage services that are supposed to promote deception and irresponsibility in the student population or to define and develop guidelines and restrictions for this sector. It is sincerely hoped that academic institutions and NGOs committed to learning and education to adopt a common position strong.

Calling the Federal Trade Commission is clear. We must learn about the future because of rapidly changing technology present consumer issues. We educate the emancipation would help us avoid the pitfalls of possible fraud and practices misleading. However, we must always be aware that there is misinformation and factual information while using the advantage of institutions unscrupulous companies to mislead the public patronizing their services over its competitors.

(Note: The tradenames of their respective companies and brands are the property of the registered owners. The author does not own or intend to take advantage of their screen Figure 1 of this Act. Note note that 'white' real logos of these companies even if some of these companies had given its consent for me after image. I felt to display their logos, even when it authorized the use of his stature and prestige. The original copies of photographs taken 03 de diciembre webscr 2008 and 09 January 2008 is preserved for evidence. The author is motivated by the desire to recognize the public's right to know the truth without censorship and what this means for the industry.)

Please visit http://voirdireveritas.blogspot.com/ For more help and corroborating evidence.

References:

1) "unfair competition" Legal Information Institute Cornell University Law School.

2) Lanham Act of 1946 or 15 USCA § 1051 et seq.

3) 15 USC 45 (1)

4) Axact (Pvt.) Ltd.v. Student Network Resources, 2008 WL 4754907 (DNJ October 22, 2008)

5) The lawyers of Pakistan blog. Accessed December 28, 2008 http://pklawyers.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/case-study-1/

6) Speech by former Commissioner Janet D. Steiger, the FTC decided to institute the practice in New York September 17, 1996.

7) All statements made by the author are supported by documentary and other evidence which was officially presented above.

T. Hall Public speaking class essay #1